Friday, August 31, 2007

2008 Chrysler Sebring Touring - Comparison Tests.

2008 Chrysler Comparison Tests


The new Sebring is a big guy, the largest of the group for nearly five inches in length. Compared to Sebring sedan, convertible into tail was stretched 3.2 inches. As a result of a genuinely useful trunk even with the top folded down the rear seats and is far roomiest. Sebring, it is painless this group, and we are impressed interior materials. We critically Chryslers for their years of Shiny-shining booth, it is clear plastic. But not here. The colors are subtle Audi, surfaces are gloss-free zones, and just when we thought we'd seen every grain pattern that man could hatch, Chrysler designers went abstract, forsaking imitation leather in favor of a simulated spatter effect. It really works. Indeed, the quality of interior materials easily tops the group. Taking all this into consideration, we rated the Sebring at the bottom of the class.
How come? This is our version of bazooms thing. Sebring is not fun at the dance. The tires melt away when you push through the turns. Skidpad influence peripheral 0.76 grams, compared with 0.83 for the best muscle here Mustang. A small V-6, 1.2-and 1.3-litre down to the other took 9.6 seconds to reach 60 mph, and the second half and had a quarter-mile than competing convertible. It wins on fuel economy, however.

In fact, the Sebring drives very well in resort wear mode (some call that normal driving). Guiding light to the touch, but the building just outside the center said steering angles. Brakes also pretty slowly, not wasted pedal movement. And the four-speed automatic has the right to go there when you need to get a little more speed ratio. Before buckets shaped for comfort, do not claim to the sport. Like any good instrument Sebring does not require human attention, as it goes about its work.
Extrapolation Gothic styling details Crossfire to full size car size was risky reception, and we believe that out of. Tin roof ridges on the hood reminiscent long ago hog sheds. But Chrysler credited to take additional steps to obtain hard roof right. She went to three sections, so you can stow in a small space than Pontiac two-piecer, thereby constitute luggage space, the upper refused in the main branch. Good date, but Sebring softtops suffer punishment than traditional ragtops because they repeatedly use the hard roof mechanism, which means that they use much more luggage space than traditional ragtops.

Sebring in softtop totally isolated, as the Mustang, but Chrysler is doing a better job, that smooth and light.